Feature #1873
Look into an alternative storage schema for nodes (and properties?)
Status: | Closed | Start date: | 2008-10-27 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Must have | Due date: | ||
Assigned To: | - | % Done: | 0% |
|
Category: | Storage Backend | |||
Target version: | - |
Description
The current storage schema is not better than in any crude beginner's code example. There are surely better ways...
History
#1 Updated by Karsten Dambekalns almost 7 years ago
- Priority changed from Should have to Must have
- Target version set to 197
#2 Updated by Karsten Dambekalns about 6 years ago
- Target version changed from 197 to 198
#3 Updated by Karsten Dambekalns about 6 years ago
- Status changed from New to Accepted
#4 Updated by Karsten Dambekalns over 4 years ago
- Status changed from Accepted to Closed
#5 Updated by Robert Lemke about 4 years ago
- Target version deleted (
198)